Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  141 / 743 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 141 / 743 Next Page
Page Background

Dynamic Data Analysis – v5.12.01 - © KAPPA 1988-2017

Chapte

r 4 – R ate Transient Analysis (RTA)

- p141/743

Only problem is that the time function used by the first plot,

ta

involves the reservoir average

pressure hence it requires an estimate of the reserves.

In this Topaze example, the complete procedure follows:

(1) Estimate Gi beforehand.

(2) By selecting a time range where the system is believed to be in pseudo steady state, the

software performs an automatic regression to determine b using equation (1) and the method

defined above.

(3) Then the straight line method will be applied in the plot

Zp

/

versus Q, Pi/Zi can be input

to find Gi (STGIIP).

Like most of the methods extrapolating a behavior the constraint is that the well status and

production conditions must be constant in the interval used for the analysis.

4.C.5

P-Q diagnostic plot

The two methods presented above require selecting data set during the P.S.S. flow period.

Kabir et al. presented a cartesian plot of P vs q which provides a simple way to perform a

diagnosis.

The life of a production well can be divided in three type of behavior:

1.

The infinite acting radial flow

2.

A period during which the production is maintained and imposed by the completion.

3.

The Pseudo Steady State, when the well behavior is boundary dominated.

During the P.S.S. it is demonstrated that the slope dp/dq is governed by the equation:

dt

dq

Ahc

Bq

dq

dp

t

wf

2339 .0

In a closed system, the rate has an exponential decline, therefore, the slope dp/dq will be

constant and function of the drained volume.

A typical P vs Q plot behaviour would be:

Fig. 4.C.10 – Typical P vs Q plot