Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  144 / 743 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 144 / 743 Next Page
Page Background

Dynamic Data Analysis – v5.12.01 - © KAPPA 1988-2017

Chapte

r 4 – R ate Transient Analysis (RTA)

- p144/743

They demonstrated that the real gas constant pressure solution, when plotted using

normalized time, exhibits a boundary-dominated period that matches the exponential decline.

The major drawback however, is that the normalized time expression requires an a priori

knowledge of the average pressure, hence of the reserves. The method is thus iterative in

nature.

Note: if the normalized time is not used a gas response in depletion mode will not necessarily

follow the exponential decline.

Using Fetkovich type-curves

It is important to remember that the Fetkovich type-curve is based, for the depletion part, on

the Arps decline curves. Like the decline curves it suffers some limitations:

-

It is assumed that the bottom-hole pressure is fairly constant. Fetkovich suggests that if

the pressure is smooth, and uniformly decreasing, one could use a

p normalized rate.

-

The well behavior is assumed constant, e.g. no change in skin with time.

The drainage area of the considered well is constant, i.e. the producing behavior of

surrounding wells must also be stabilized.

4.D.2.b

Gas material balance

ZP

vs Q plot

This method is specific to gas. It is not an ‘adapted’ oil method to gas, it is presented in the

chapter ‘The old stuff’.

4.D.3

The right stuff

4.D.3.a

Blasingame plot

The cornerstone of the Blasingame plot is the linearity between the normalized rate

 

 

q t

p p t

i

w

and

1

t

e

during boundary dominated flow. This relation, valid for a slightly

compressible fluid, does not apply to gas unless the rate is normalized with respect to

 

m p

and the time is modified as follows:

t

t

g

g

g

ti gi

egas

dt

pcp

tq

q

c

t

0

) ( ) (

)(

)0(