Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  104 / 743 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 743 Next Page
Page Background

Dynamic Data Analysis – v5.12.01 - © KAPPA 1988-2017

Chapte

r 3 – P ressure Transient Analysis (PTA) -

p104/743

Fig. 3.F.2 – Ambiguous model identification

The behaviour of the period that will be analysed is very dependent upon the previous history

and in particular any disturbances immediately before the period in question. If flow rate

changes or small shutin periods immediately prior to the subject period cannot be avoided, at

least the value of the flow rates should be captured. This is a detail that should be stressed in

any test program.

Fig. 3.F.3 – Disturbing the period for analysis

During a buildup that was designed for analysis purposes avoid as far a safety permits any

surface operations that may jeopardize the usefulness of the period. The example below

illustrates a real case where some surface operations affected the buildup period and rendered

it for all practical purposes useless for any analysis with confidence.