Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  161 / 743 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 161 / 743 Next Page
Page Background

Dynamic Data Analysis – v5.12.01 - © KAPPA 1988-2017

Chapte

r 4 – R ate Transient Analysis (RTA)

- p161/743

4.F.5

Validity of the PTA hypothesis in Rate Transient Analysis

PTA can provide a clean snapshot of what the well and reservoir system is at a given time. RTA

covers a much wider time range, and some of the assumptions valid during a single well test

will not be true over the well producing history. The three main differences are related to the

well productivity, the drainage area and multiphase production.

PTA models account for rate-dependent skin. It is also known that the well may be cleaning up

during the initial production phase. So the well productivity may not be constant during a well

test. However this is a reasonable assumption for a single build-up, and optimization will be

possible with a single mechanical skin model. In RTA this is unlikely. Well productivity does

change over time, and no optimization process is reasonably possible over a long period of

time without considering a time-dependent skin.

In PTA, boundary effects are generally material boundaries, even though interfering wells can

produce the same effects as boundaries. In RTA we consider the well drainage area. Except

when there is only one producing well, part or all of the drainage area boundaries are

immaterial, depending on the flow equilibrium between the neighboring wells. The drainage

area will change in time when new wells are produced, or even when the flow rates change

asymmetrically. To account for these changes, a multi well model, either analytical or

numerical, may be required.

In PTA we approximately handle multiphase cases using pseudo-pressures or considering that

saturations are constant and the flow can be modelled with an equivalent single-phase fluid as

in Perrine’s method. In RTA, solutions exist that consider that individual fluids develop PSS

independently. However these solutions make a global correction for multiphase production

but they are unable to forecast the breakthroughs. There is a point where only a history match

with a numerical model can account for multiphase production.