Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  119 / 743 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 119 / 743 Next Page
Page Background

Dynamic Data Analysis – v5.12.01 - © KAPPA 1988-2017

Chapte

r 3 – P ressure Transient Analysis (PTA) -

p119/743

3.J

The case of dry gas

3.J.1

Diffusion of real dry gas

As mentioned in the ‘Theory’ chapter, in order to extend the methodology of Dynamic Data

Analysis to gas cases, we introduce a function of the pressure called the pseudopressure. It is

given by:

Gas pseudopressure:

 

dp

Z

p

pm

p

0

2

Using the gas pseudo pressure instead of the pressure,

the diffusion equation remains valid

the same methodology presented above can apply.

In addition to these methods, the gas case presents few particularities presented here.

3.J.2

Correcting the pressure to sandface

Usually the pressure gauge is not set at the sandface due to mechanical constraints in the

completion. Because of this, the results obtained from the pressure transient analysis are at

the level of the gauge and not the sandface which, in terms of pressure (Pi) and skin (S), will

not reflect the true sandface conditions.

It is necessary first to define the vertical pressure profile in the well. The Saphir/Topaze

internal flow correlations or an actual lift curve generated by some specialized program (i.e.

Amethyste) can be used for this.

The available correlation for gas is an external lift curve or the internal Cullender & Smith

method, but with two modifications for handling water and condensate.

The correlation is based on the gas properties as defined in the PVT setup, and a general

friction factor is calculated using the Colebrook and White equation. Note that when you deal

with a condensate case with equivalent gas gravity and total rates, the proper gradient and

rates are used in the correlation to account for the condensate presence. The presence of

water can be accounted for, based on a constant water to gas production ratio.

The solution selected in Saphir is to include both the hydrostatic and friction pressure loss in

the model and correct the generated model response to the actual gauge depth, and then to

return all the results at the sandface.

In fact, the gauge pressure is not transformed, nor corrected hence it is the model that is

brought to the level of the gauge.